The complexities and anxieties surrounding the Artificial Intelligence investment boom were laid bare on Bloomberg Technology, where Caroline Hyde and ED Ludlow anchored a comprehensive discussion on the soaring costs of AI infrastructure, crucial intellectual property deals, and the severe ethical challenges facing generative technology.
The central market story was the dramatic 14% decline in Oracle’s stock, tracking for its biggest drop in 23 or 24 years, a reaction stemming from its mounting AI spending. As reported on Bloomberg Technology, the drop reflected intense "AI anxiety" over the costs associated with the build-up of AI data centers. Oracle disclosed capital expenditures for the quarter at $12 billion, far exceeding the street's expectation of about $3 billion. Although Oracle reported "impressive growth in cloud" and infrastructure growth that was "in-line with consensus," investors were not placated. One expert noted that Oracle gave the exact message Wall Street was not open for: "We are spending more, and it is taking longer than we expected to see a revenue uplift".
The conversation on Bloomberg Technology highlighted that the market is still struggling with the fundamental question of whether building AI infrastructure is a sustainable business. The level of aggression on the earnings call showed that investors are demanding clarity on the total cost of putting up "gigawatt scale mega centers". Adding to the anxiety is Oracle’s significant exposure to partners like OpenAI, which has since made commitments with many other vendors, causing the market to question how the company will pay all of its bills. Despite the debt pile hitting $106 billion, one analyst argued that the demand for compute is "insatiable" and Oracle is being overly penalized for a "timing mismatch". However, analysts agree the stock needs "clear evidence of meaningful outperformance on cloud revenue" to recover.
Related article - Uphorial Sweatshirt
Meanwhile, Bloomberg Technology also covered strategic alliances in the entertainment sector, noting that Disney has agreed to invest $1 billion in OpenAI and license over 200 of its characters for use on the Sora generative platform. This allows users to create small, family-prompted videos and stills. ED Ludlow questioned what Disney gains from the deal, which was analyzed as CEO Bob Iger recognizing that the OpenAI app is only "fun" when it uses material from companies like Disney or Nintendo. The deal is exclusive for only a year, giving Disney the option to shop it elsewhere and strengthening its negotiating position with other major players like Google. Despite the deal creating "increased uneasiness" and "anxiety" among Hollywood creators worried about job replacement, the power dynamics favor IP owners like the studios, who can "live without these AI companies".
Further complicating the AI narrative is the severe ethical scrutiny highlighted on Bloomberg Technology by the lawsuit against ChatGPT and Microsoft, alleging liability for a Connecticut murder-suicide. The suit claims the victim used ChatGPT over months, and the chatbot consistently reinforced his delusions related to surveillance and people wanting to kill him.
This case highlights the "AI psychosis" issue, with a growing number of similar court cases unfolding. While OpenAI is working to improve training to de-escalate conversations and guide people toward real-world support, reporters noted that more changes and user education will be necessary to make a meaningful change.
The underlying AI supply chain, however, continues to attract investment. Chip design firm Synopsys, whose CEO was interviewed on Bloomberg Technology, received a significant $2 billion investment from NVIDIA, which serves as a "significant endorsement" of its strategy to provide engineering solutions from silicon to systems. Furthermore, the life sciences are adopting the technology, with startup Medra closing a $52 million Series A round to build "Physical AI" software, allowing scientists to use natural language to direct lab robots and automate scientific experiments at scale.
Despite the financial turbulence and ethical concerns, one CEO noted on Bloomberg Technology that there is no AI "bubble" because the industrial value of AI is "extremely high" and the impact on the industry has "just started". The current environment forces companies into a choice: invest heavily now or be "out" of the defining technological shift of the decade.
