In early August 2025, Chinese authorities quietly summoned major domestic players Tencent, ByteDance, and Baidu, questioning their H20 purchases, particularly for government or national security uses. The directive, though not an outright ban, came loaded with implication: prioritise homegrown chips, lower your reliance on US tech.
This pivot is about more than silicon. It is about sovereignty, self-reliance, and projecting power. For years, geopolitics has infiltrated our chips; now it is front and center. The H20 chips were designed as scaled-down versions of NVIDIA's Hopper-based models, adjusted to comply with US export controls. Yet, even as Washington resumed those exports under a deal granting 15% of revenue to the US government, Beijing pushed back, signalling unease with foreign hardware no matter how compliant. Nvidia responded by clarifying that the H20 was never meant for military or government use and contains no “backdoors.” But the narrative in state media took shape regardless. The message became clear: trust domestic innovation.
Related article - Uphorial Sweatshirt
Meanwhile, America's tech gods clashed in Silicon Valley's legal arenas. Elon Musk, renowned for his spectacle, accused Apple of giving OpenAI's ChatGPT preferential treatment in its App Store. Musk claims the app monopolizes visibility while his own Grok languishes at #5 and threatened a lawsuit for alleged antitrust violations. The spotlight was not just on chips; now it was on platforms, algorithms, and the gatekeepers of digital attention.
And as Elon squared off with Apple, Circle's CEO Jeremy Allaire seized the moment in fintech. Riding the wave of its first earnings since going public, Circle revealed explosive 53% revenue growth ($658 million), though offset by a hefty $482 million loss, mainly IPO related, non-cash charges. He unveiled plans for Arc, an enterprise-grade, EVM-compatible Layer 1 blockchain intended to anchor payments, FX, capital markets, and use USDC at scale.
What ties these disparate narratives together? A global tech landscape riven by competition, control, and ambition.
Consider China's chip edict: more than policy, it is a story of identity. For years, China's tech ambitions marched alongside Western infrastructure. Now, the march diverges. Beijing in effect says: chart your path, rely on our chips, not theirs. That simple pivot challenges Nvidia's market, and signals a broader shift in the tech order. Zoom to the App Store fray. Elon's grievance is not just about rankings; it is about who gets to compete, innovate, and capture eyeballs. The App Store is a gatekeeper that controls exposure, revenue, and success. Musk's legal threat lights up what many smaller developers have long felt: visibility matters as much as code. And in fintech, Allaires Arc is not just a product; it is an argument. It is a case for decentralization, for building an alternative backbone in financial transactions. It is not revolutionary in concept, but revolutionary in timing: as centralization tightens elsewhere, alternatives gain appeal.
So what do we make of all of this?
We see a world where chips are not neutral. They are geopolitical chess pieces. A world where digital storefronts can make or break innovations. A world where financial rails are being architected anew by startups and stablecoins as much as by banks. It is not just about China urging firms to avoid a chip. It is about trust. Who do you trust when your data, your transactions, your AI, which touches sovereignty, commerce, expression, is shaped by companies abroad? It is a story worth writing deeply, because the stakes are silicon deep.
